Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as propriedades físico-químicas e o potencial bioativo de Sealer Plus, em comparação com MTA Fillapex, Sealapex e AH Plus. Tempo de presa, escoamento e radiopacidade foram avaliados com base nas normas ISO 6876. O escoamento foi também avaliado em área (mm²). A solubilidade e a alteração volumétrica dos cimentos foram avaliadas após 7 e 30 dias de imersão em água destilada. A solubilidade foi analisada pela diferença entre as massas dos cimentos antes e após imersão. A alteração volumétrica foi avaliada por meio de microtomografia computadorizada (micro-CT). O potencial bioativo dos cimentos foi observado por Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura (MEV) após imersão em PBS. Os dados foram comparados usando os testes ANOVA e Tukey (α=0.05). Sealer Plus apresentou o tempo de presa mais curto (196 min.) e Sealapex o mais longo (912 min.) (p<0.05). AH Plus mostrou a radiopacidade mais alta (9.5 mm Al) e MTA Fillapex a mais baixa (2.7 mm Al) (p<0.05). Todos os cimentos tiveram escoamento de acordo com as normas ISO 6876/2012 (>17 mm). Sealer Plus mostrou baixos valores de solubilidade e alteração volumétrica (<1%) e MTA Fillapex teve os valores mais altos de solubilidade (>25%) e alteração volumétrica (>4%) em todos os períodos avaliados (p<0.05). MTA Fillapex foi o único cimento que mostrou potencial bioativo. Como conclusão, Sealer Plus apresentou propriedades físico-químicas adequadas, entretanto, não apresentou potencial bioativo.

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate physicochemical properties and bioactive potential of Sealer Plus, in comparison with MTA Fillapex, Sealapex and AH Plus. Setting time, flow, and radiopacity were evaluated based on ISO 6876 Standard. Flow was also assessed in area (mm²). The solubility and volumetric change of the sealers were evaluated after 7 and 30 days of immersion in distilled water. Solubility was evaluated by the difference in mass of materials before and after immersion. Volumetric change was evaluated by using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). The bioactive potential was observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) after immersion in PBS. Data were compared using ANOVA and Tukey tests (α=0.05). Sealer Plus presented the shortest setting time (196 min.) and Sealapex the longest (912 min.) (p<0.05). AH Plus showed the highest radiopacity (9.5 mm Al) and MTA Fillapex the lowest (2.7 mm Al) (p<0.05). All the sealers presented flow in accordance with ISO 6876/2012 (>17 mm). Sealer Plus showed low solubility and volumetric change (<1%), and MTA Fillapex showed the highest solubility (>25%), and volumetric change (>4%) after all time intervals (p<0.05). MTA Fillapex was the only sealer that showed bioactive potential. In conclusion, Sealer Plus presented proper physicochemical properties. However, this sealer did not present a bioactive potential.

Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as propriedades físico-químicas e a resistência de união à dentina apical do cimento Biodentine em comparação ao MTA branco e cimento à base de óxido de zinco e eugenol (OZE). O tempo de presa e a radiopacidade foram avaliados de acordo com as especificações ISO 6876:2012. O tempo de presa final, a resistência à compressão e o pH também foram avaliados. A resistência de união dos materiais à dentina apical do canal radicular foi avaliada por meio do ensaio push-out. Dados foram analisados por ANOVA e teste complementar de Tukey-Krammer. Biodentine apresentou o menor tempo de presa inicial (16,2±1,48 min) e final (35,4±5,55 min). Os valores de radiopacidade do Biodentine (2,79±0,27 mmAl) não estão de acordo com as especificações ISO 6876:2012. Por outro lado, este material apresentou maior resistência à compressão após 21 dias (37,22±5,27 MPa) e maiores valores de adesão à dentina (11,2±2,16 MPa) em comparação ao MTA branco (27,68±3,56 MPa de resistência à compressão e 2,98±0,64 MPa de resistência de união) (p>0.05). Ambos os materiais produziram ambiente alcalino (aproximadamente 10) (p>0.05) em comparação ao OZE (pH 7). Pode-se concluir que o Biodentine demonstrou endurecimento mais rápido e apresentou maior resistência à compressão e resistência de união à dentina apical do que MTA e OZE.

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical properties and the apical dentin bond strength of the tricalcium silicate-based Biodentine in comparison to white MTA and zinc oxide eugenol-based cement (ZOE). Setting time and radiopacity were evaluated according to ISO 6876:2012 specification. Final setting time, compressive strength and pH were also assessed. Material’s bond strength to the apical root canal dentin was measured by the push-out assay. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey-Krammer post-hoc test. Biodentine presented the shortest initial (16.2±1.48 min) and final setting time (35.4±5.55 min). Radiopacity of Biodentine (2.79±0.27 mmAl) does not agree with ISO 6876:2012 specifications. On the other hand, Biodentine showed higher compressive strength after 21 days (37.22±5.27 MPa) and higher dentin bond strength (11.2±2.16 MPa) in comparison to white MTA (27.68±3.56 MPa for compressive strength and 2.98±0.64 MPa for bond strength) (p<0.05). Both MTA and Biodentine produced an alkaline environment (approximately pH 10) (p>0.05) compared to ZOE (pH 7). It may be concluded that Biodentine exhibited faster setting, higher long-term compressive strength and bond strength to the apical dentin than MTA and ZOE.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a radiopacidade e o escoamento dos cimentos endodonticos: AH Plus, Endo CPM Sealer, Fillapex, Sealapex, Epiphany e Epiphany SE. Para o teste de radiopacidade foram confeccionados corpos de prova com 10mm de largura e 1mm de espessura, radiografados juntamente com uma escala de aluminio sobre filme oclusal. As imagens foram digitalizadas e foi determinada a equivalencia em milimetros de aluminio. Para avaliacao do escoamento, foram colocados 0,05 �} 0,005 ml do cimento em placa de vidro, e sobre este uma massa de 120g. Foi realizada mensuracao do maior e menor diametro de cada especime e as amostras foram fotografadas e digitalizadas para mensuracao da area do cimento em mm2 pelo programa UTHSCSA Image Tool for Windows Versao 3.00. Os dados foram analisados por ANOVA e teste Tukey, com 5% de significancia. AH Plus e Epiphany SE apresentaram maior radiopacidade (12,5 mm Al e 12,0 mm Al, respectivamente) (p>0,05), seguidos pelo Epiphany (9,6 mm Al) e Fillapex (8,9 mm Al). Endo CPM (5,46 mm Al) e Sealapex (5,51 mm Al) apresentaram menor radiopacidade. O MTA Fillapex apresentou valor de escoamento superior aos demais materiais (33,11 mm e 844,9 mm²). Os cimentos AH Plus, Epiphany e Epiphany SE apresentaram valores similares e intermediarios (p>0,05), seguidos pelos cimentos Endo CPM Sealer (342,8 mm² e 21,05 mm) e Sealapex (352,5 mm2 e 19,98 mm) que apresentaram menor escoamento (p>0,05). Todos os cimentos avaliados estao em acordo com as recomendacoes da norma ISO e ANSI/ADA.

The present study evaluated the radiopacity and flow of different endodontic sealers: AH Plus, Endo CPM, MTA Fillapex, Sealapex, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE. For the radiopacity test, six specimens measuring 10mm in diameter and 1mm in thickness were fabricated from each material. They were radiographed on an occlusal film alongside an aluminum step wedge. Radiographs were digitized to determine the radiopacity equivalence in millimeters of aluminum. To evaluate the flow, a 120 g load was placed on top of a glass slab containing 0.05 �} 0.005ml of sealer. The diameters of each material were measured (mm) with a caliper and samples were photographed. Digitized images were analyzed using the UTHSCSA Image Tool for Windows software, to determine the sealer area (mm²). Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance. AH Plus and Epiphany SE presented the greatest radiopacity (12.5 mm Al and 12.0 mm Al, respectively) (p>0.05), followed by Epiphany (9.6 mm Al) and Fillapex (8.9 mm Al). Endo CPM (5.46 mm Al) and Sealapex (5.51 mm Al) presented lower radiopacity. MTA Fillapex presented significantly higher values of flow than other sealers (33.11 mm and 844.9 mm2). AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE had similar values. Endo CPM (21.05 mm and 342.8 mm²) and Sealapex (19.98 mm and 352.5 mm²) presented the lowest flow values (p>0.05). All sealers presented radiopacity and flow values according to ISO and ANSI/ADA recommendations.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different restorative procedures on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth submitted to intracoronal bleaching. Fifty upper central incisors were distributed into 5 groups: GI - healthy teeth; GII - endodontically treated teeth sealed with Coltosol; GIII - endodontically treated teeth bleached and sealed with Coltosol; GIV - endodontically treated teeth bleached and restored with composite resin; and GV - endodontically treated teeth bleached and restored with a fiberglass post and composite resin. In the bleached specimens, a cervical seal was made prior to bleaching with 38% hydrogen peroxide. The gel was applied on the buccal surface and in the pulp chamber, and was then light-activated for 45 s. This procedure was repeated three times per session for four sessions, and each group was submitted to the restorative procedures described above. The specimens were submitted to fracture resistance testing in a universal testing machine. There were statistically significant differences among the groups (p < 0.05). The mean value found for GIII was the lowest (0.32 kN) and was significantly different from the values found for GI (0.75 kN), GII (0.67 kN), GIV (0.70 kN), and GV (0.72 kN), which were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). The restorative procedures using composite resin were found to successfully restore the fracture resistance of endodontically treated and bleached teeth.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hydrogenionic potential and electrical conductivity of Portland cements and MTA, as well as the amount of arsenic and calcium released from these materials. In Teflon molds, samples of each material were agitated and added to plastic flasks containing distilled water for 3, 24, 72 and 168 h. The results were analyzed with a Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test for global comparisons and a Dunn-Tukey test for pairwise comparisons. The results revealed no significant differences in the pH of the materials (p > 0.05). The electrical conductivity of the cements were not statistically different (p > 0.05). White non-structural cement and MTA BIO released the largest amount of calcium ions into solution (p < 0.05), while arsenic release was insignificant in all of the materials (p > 0.05). The results indicated that the physico-chemical properties of Portland cements and MTA were similar. Furthermore, all materials produced an alkaline environment and can be considered safe for clinical use because arsenic was not released. The electrical conductivity and the amount of calcium ions released into solution increased over time.